How to Find a Zostavax Lawyer
Using the services of a Zostavax Lawyer is essential to ensuring that you receive the compensation that you are entitled to. This is because the law states that if you are injured as a result of the use of this medication, you are entitled to compensation. However, you need to follow certain guidelines in order to be able to file your claim.
Merck & Company
Thousands of Zostavax lawsuits have been filed against Merck & Co. in recent months. These lawsuits are filed by people who claim that the vaccine caused them serious side effects.
Zostavax is a shingles vaccine manufactured by Merck & Co. The FDA approved the vaccine in 2006. The vaccine is a live-attenuated form of the wild type virus. Zostavax is intended to prevent shingles in people over age 50. The vaccine is not effective in younger people.
Plaintiffs in Zostavax lawsuits claim that the Zostavax vaccine is defectively designed. They claim that the vaccine caused brain damage, eye injuries, and other serious side effects. They also claim that Merck should have submitted a safer vaccine to the FDA instead of relying on its live-attenuated version.
These lawsuits are also called “mass torts.” A mass tort is when a group of people file suit against a single defendant. The lawsuit may or may not be successful.
Side effects
Vaccines like Zostavax may cause serious side effects, and they should be discussed with your doctor. Zostavax is a live virus vaccine that is meant to prevent shingles. However, it has been linked to a serious complication known as post-herpetic neuralgia. This condition affects the nerve fibers and skin. It can cause pain, burning, and permanent facial paralysis.
Zostavax is administered by your doctor as a single 0.65-mL dose subcutaneously in the deltoid region of the upper arm. It is not recommended for pregnant women. It is also not recommended for those with weakened immune systems.
Zostavax is also linked to a severe neurological complication known as Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP). The complication is often characterized by a painful band of blisters on one side of the torso. It may take months to develop.
Zostavax was also linked to an increased risk of liver failure. Several patients have reported recurring outbreaks of shingles after getting the vaccine.
Compensation for injuries
Hundreds of Zostavax lawsuits have been filed in states across the United States. These lawsuits claim that Merck & Co. Pharmaceuticals, the company that makes the Zostavax vaccine, did not warn about the side effects of the vaccine. The side effects can include a rash, fever, headache, and pain.
Despite the serious side effects, Merck continues to sell Zostavax. In fact, Merck recently requested that many of the Zostavax lawsuits be consolidated into a single case in federal court.
Whether or not you can file a Zostavax lawsuit depends on a number of factors. A Zostavax vaccine injury lawyer can help you determine whether you have a claim. A lawyer can also assist you with obtaining the evidence that you need. Using a lawyer can help you get the compensation you deserve.
Zostavax is designed to protect patients against the risk of contracting shingles. However, this vaccine may actually be the cause of shingles. It is not recommended for children and pregnant women.
Timeline for filing a lawsuit
Depending on the state, there are different statutes of limitations for filing a Zostavax lawsuit. The most common are two years.
Zostavax is a shingles vaccine that is distributed by Merck & Co. Inc., one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world. The vaccine was initially introduced in 2006. The company claims that Zostavax is safe to use and prevents shingles, the rash that looks like chickenpox. However, it also allegedly causes more severe shingles for some users.
Zostavax is a vaccine that is administered in a single dose. It is meant to protect older adults from the infection of shingles, which causes painful blisters on one side of the body.
After Merck began distribution of the vaccine in 2006, there were several outbreaks of shingles that were linked to the use of the vaccine. Merck also failed to inform consumers of possible side effects, including auto-immune disorders. These side effects, according to plaintiffs, led to more serious complications for some users.